Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14191 - 14200 of 30191 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jason S. Petri
assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14748 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Larry A. Coon
. App. 1995). We review a probable cause determination de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5103 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
presented sufficient grounds for relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Because nothing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12

[PDF] Janice M. Eilola v. Linda Hattlestad
. Whether the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15254 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
3 Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands the proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40272 - 2014-09-15

A T Polishing Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law which we may review de novo. See Klusendorf Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. v. LIRC, 110 Wis. 2d 328, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2235 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
question reviewed de novo. State v. Anagnos, 2012 WI 64, ¶21, 341 Wis. 2d 576, 815 N.W.2d 675. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100745 - 2013-08-14

[PDF] State v. Lawrence Northern
de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d 575, No. 03-0246-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28390 - 2007-03-13