Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14191 - 14200 of 58127 for us.
Search results 14191 - 14200 of 58127 for us.
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree all around. ¶9 “We review suppression motions using a two-step process.” State v. Pender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
disagree all around. ¶9 “We review suppression motions using a two-step process.” State v. Pender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
line, asking someone to go to his house and retrieve his “heat” from under a dresser. Using
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149287 - 2017-09-21
line, asking someone to go to his house and retrieve his “heat” from under a dresser. Using
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149287 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interest[s], using the erroneous exercise of discretion standard.” Id. ¶9 The record is silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201519 - 2017-11-15
interest[s], using the erroneous exercise of discretion standard.” Id. ¶9 The record is silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201519 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel informs us that, based on her discussions with Carlos and with his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736205 - 2023-12-06
counsel informs us that, based on her discussions with Carlos and with his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736205 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Irish
therefore affirm the judgment of commitment.2 The issue Irish raises requires us to construe § 980.01(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
therefore affirm the judgment of commitment.2 The issue Irish raises requires us to construe § 980.01(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
used by Newman were inherently suggestive and the resulting identification should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
used by Newman were inherently suggestive and the resulting identification should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
[PDF]
Edwin F. Haferman v. Mary K. Hebenstreit
, Haferman asks us: (1) to “find as fact” that his mobile home constitutes personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5114 - 2017-09-19
, Haferman asks us: (1) to “find as fact” that his mobile home constitutes personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5114 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
will usually permit a respondent to employ any theory or argument on appeal that will allow us to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131517 - 2014-12-10
will usually permit a respondent to employ any theory or argument on appeal that will allow us to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131517 - 2014-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intended, designed, or adapted for use in a break-in, and that he possessed the tools with the intention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228851 - 2018-11-29
intended, designed, or adapted for use in a break-in, and that he possessed the tools with the intention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228851 - 2018-11-29
Willie M. Williams v. Daniel R. Bertrand
submitted with his brief leads us to the following factual background.[1] While in custody at the Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15807 - 2005-03-31
submitted with his brief leads us to the following factual background.[1] While in custody at the Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15807 - 2005-03-31