Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1421 - 1430 of 20944 for word.

State v. Walter A. Kirch III
as it is used in this subsection. If the legislature does not assign a technical meaning to a statutory word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13683 - 2005-03-31

Michael W. Gragg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. § 632.32(5)(f). In particular, they emphasize that the word “stacking” does not appear anywhere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3519 - 2005-03-31

Eliud Velez v. Jon Litscher
the word “policy” in quotation marks, and refers to it as a “de facto policy.” His point in doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6628 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael W. Gragg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
in WIS. STAT. § 632.32(5)(f). In particular, they emphasize that the word “stacking” does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3519 - 2017-09-19

State v. Joseph H. Eckstein
to kill his wife in both his words and his conduct. Despite Eckstein’s protestations to the contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2145 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
received a call from dispatch that a female passenger in a white Mercedes Benz had mouthed the words “Help
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32258 - 2008-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
is ambiguous. Id., ¶13. We give words in the policy their common and ordinary meaning, that is, what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07

[PDF] Kinko's, Inc. v. Craig Shuler
, the interpretation of words or clauses in an insurance contract is a question of law we review de novo. Shorewood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4363 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 87
words, Hughes argues that because the jury never actually saw the judgment of conviction, it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64241 - 2014-09-15

Dina Matlin v. City of Sheboygan
the raze order is reasonable…. (Emphasis added.) Use of the word “shall” creates a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2987 - 2005-03-31