Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14211 - 14220 of 63256 for promissory note/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 11, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
“a dark, blue hooded sweatshirt,” and noted that his demeanor was consistent with someone who “had just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107884 - 2014-02-10

COURT OF APPEALS
of the witnesses. See State v. Embry, 46 Wis. 2d 151, 160, 174 N.W.2d 521 (1970) (noting when “an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
.” The court also noted that Elizabeth’s income was imputed at the time of the divorce at $36,000. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26831 - 2006-10-16

State v. Keith Griffin
. It is important to note that the assistance of a staff advocate is made available to inmates facing prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11291 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶12 The State properly notes that in making this argument, Brown ignores the evidence produced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141769 - 2015-05-18

COURT OF APPEALS
because there were no detainers lodged against him. Hoeft correctly notes that nothing in the text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30222 - 2007-09-10

State v. Donna E. Howard-Hastings
are not controlling, we note that other chapters of the criminal code define “victim” to include governmental entities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13132 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis L. Hohol
] am going to note for the record that, as is readily apparent to the attorneys, that I have not in any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19750 - 2005-09-27

State v. Andres A. Delreal
denied the motion, noting: [T]here’s nothing that’s been said to the Court that these two[2] lawyers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2336 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Performance ¶6 We begin by noting that the State does not dispute Crisler’s contention that the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15