Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14211 - 14220 of 47101 for shows.
Search results 14211 - 14220 of 47101 for shows.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2023-24).1 “The burden of showing that there has been a change in circumstances sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
)(a) (2023-24).1 “The burden of showing that there has been a change in circumstances sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
State v. John D. Meindl
or fewer prior convictions … the fact that the analysis shows that the person had an alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
or fewer prior convictions … the fact that the analysis shows that the person had an alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
must show that his counsel’s performance was both deficient and prejudicial. Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
must show that his counsel’s performance was both deficient and prejudicial. Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
Nancy M. Bedora v. David L. Bedora
construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. The burden of showing property should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12879 - 2013-05-28
construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. The burden of showing property should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12879 - 2013-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to show both that counsel’s representation was deficient and that the deficiency was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34518 - 2008-11-11
the defendant to show both that counsel’s representation was deficient and that the deficiency was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34518 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
boundary line between the properties. The survey showed the fence lay approximately sixty feet north
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42316 - 2009-10-19
boundary line between the properties. The survey showed the fence lay approximately sixty feet north
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42316 - 2009-10-19
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March
a “show-up,” and involves letting an eyewitness look at an arrestee very soon after a crime has been
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918 - 2017-09-20
a “show-up,” and involves letting an eyewitness look at an arrestee very soon after a crime has been
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2020
Savage prove that he was entitled to withdraw his plea without showing a reasonable probability that his
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304602 - 2020-11-11
Savage prove that he was entitled to withdraw his plea without showing a reasonable probability that his
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304602 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
September 10, 2016, showed “[a] truck that is the same make, year, model that [Gray] has pulled into my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14
September 10, 2016, showed “[a] truck that is the same make, year, model that [Gray] has pulled into my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14
State v. Harlan C. Richards
to allow him to show sufficient reasons for his failure to raise his § 974.06 contentions in his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9119 - 2005-03-31
to allow him to show sufficient reasons for his failure to raise his § 974.06 contentions in his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9119 - 2005-03-31