Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the residence who could have destroyed the evidence had he left and gone and got a search warrant. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39275 - 2014-09-15
in the residence who could have destroyed the evidence had he left and gone and got a search warrant. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39275 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
warranting an equal division. Ample evidence in the record also supports the court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
warranting an equal division. Ample evidence in the record also supports the court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark Conners
consent, probable cause, or a warrant, violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2264 - 2017-09-19
consent, probable cause, or a warrant, violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2264 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
warranting sentence modification. With regard to the victim’s alleged propensity for violence, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122818 - 2014-09-30
warranting sentence modification. With regard to the victim’s alleged propensity for violence, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122818 - 2014-09-30
CA Blank Order
of the offense warranted the maximum sentence. An appellate court has a duty to affirm a sentence if the facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105380 - 2013-12-05
of the offense warranted the maximum sentence. An appellate court has a duty to affirm a sentence if the facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105380 - 2013-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
without a warrant. No motion to suppress the blood test result on this ground was filed and a potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123440 - 2017-09-21
without a warrant. No motion to suppress the blood test result on this ground was filed and a potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123440 - 2017-09-21
State v. Morris F Clement
is warranted in the interest of justice; and (2) the circuit court incorrectly applied the risk assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19476 - 2005-09-06
is warranted in the interest of justice; and (2) the circuit court incorrectly applied the risk assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19476 - 2005-09-06
State v. Richard A. Edwards
of the blood test result because the blood sample was taken without a warrant, and because it constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
of the blood test result because the blood sample was taken without a warrant, and because it constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15571 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas C. Owens
to a level worth discussing,” and reiterated its position that nothing in the motion warranted a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25529 - 2006-06-14
to a level worth discussing,” and reiterated its position that nothing in the motion warranted a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25529 - 2006-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Hiram Johnson
that Johnson has not shown prejudice warranting a new trial. Johnson claims prejudice on the theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11498 - 2017-09-19
that Johnson has not shown prejudice warranting a new trial. Johnson claims prejudice on the theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11498 - 2017-09-19