Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, ¶14, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, ¶14, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Baron, 2009 WI 58, ¶10, 318 Wis. 2d 60, 769 N.W.2d 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245224 - 2019-08-21
that we review de novo. See State v. Baron, 2009 WI 58, ¶10, 318 Wis. 2d 60, 769 N.W.2d 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245224 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous standard; next, we review whether the facts meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard; next, we review whether the facts meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
issue that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
issue that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 68, 72, 515 N.W.2d 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 68, 72, 515 N.W.2d 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
Kohler Company v. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
.[5] We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8688 - 2005-03-31
.[5] We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supports the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103934 - 2017-09-21
supports the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103934 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd E. Crider
review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews’ encounter with Cali
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131971 - 2014-12-22
review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews’ encounter with Cali
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131971 - 2014-12-22