Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 30191 for de.
Joseph S. Makhlouf v. Michael J. Kern
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11159 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Louise O'Gorman v. Michael O'Gorman
: Construction of a statute or its application to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2150 - 2017-09-19
: Construction of a statute or its application to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2150 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Vernon County v. Gary E. Wolfgram
by the court meet statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4534 - 2017-09-19
by the court meet statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4534 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Keeler
review de novo. Whether a prosecutor intended to provoke a mistrial in order to gain another chance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15118 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Whether a prosecutor intended to provoke a mistrial in order to gain another chance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15118 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Linda J. Lehnertz v. CUNA Mutual Insurance Society
of limitations applies to an action is a question of law which we review de novo.” Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6519 - 2017-09-19
of limitations applies to an action is a question of law which we review de novo.” Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6519 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Munroe v. Dykstra
). This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11628 - 2017-09-19
). This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11628 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186561 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186561 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and apply these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113843 - 2017-09-21
, and apply these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113843 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21