Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218704 - 2018-09-12
. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218704 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
Allen C. Orth v. Walworth County
argued that the parcel was a parcel of record prior to the adoption of the Walworth County Zoning Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15475 - 2017-09-21
argued that the parcel was a parcel of record prior to the adoption of the Walworth County Zoning Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213862 - 2018-06-06
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213862 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
received a harsher sentence than her accomplices even though she had no criminal record and was less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21
received a harsher sentence than her accomplices even though she had no criminal record and was less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133471 - 2015-01-26
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133471 - 2015-01-26
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
CA Blank Order
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111964 - 2014-05-12
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111964 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Clark
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14406 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14406 - 2014-09-15