Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 83030 for simple case search.
Search results 14221 - 14230 of 83030 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Royce
in this case to form the basis of the stop[.]” DISCUSSION ¶8 When we review a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5306 - 2017-09-19
in this case to form the basis of the stop[.]” DISCUSSION ¶8 When we review a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5306 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
[of the search].” Miller does not contest the circuit court’s findings of fact. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
[of the search].” Miller does not contest the circuit court’s findings of fact. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
State v. Charles L. Stewart
The charges in this case arose from allegations that Stewart and two other men had pushed their way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4349 - 2005-03-31
The charges in this case arose from allegations that Stewart and two other men had pushed their way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
an arrest or search, it permits investigation. Id. ¶8 “[W]hether a traffic stop is reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31947 - 2014-09-15
an arrest or search, it permits investigation. Id. ¶8 “[W]hether a traffic stop is reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Jeske
for the failure to give sufficient justification for consecutive terms. Id., ¶¶17-18. This is not a case like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20425 - 2017-09-21
for the failure to give sufficient justification for consecutive terms. Id., ¶¶17-18. This is not a case like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
faith purchaser without notice because, had Norton searched the record, he would have discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68572 - 2014-09-15
faith purchaser without notice because, had Norton searched the record, he would have discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68572 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695 N.W.2d 315. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
that we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695 N.W.2d 315. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in another case. ¶10 Pittman now appeals the circuit court’s denial of his suppression motion. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
in another case. ¶10 Pittman now appeals the circuit court’s denial of his suppression motion. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
a specific finding necessary to support the sentence imposed, this court will search the record for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42141 - 2014-09-15
a specific finding necessary to support the sentence imposed, this court will search the record for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
erroneous. We agree and reverse the judgment. No. 96-0752 -2- This case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20
erroneous. We agree and reverse the judgment. No. 96-0752 -2- This case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20