Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 30191 for de.
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
issue that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
issue that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Larson
. Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. Babbitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9486 - 2005-03-31
. Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. Babbitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9486 - 2005-03-31
Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. The threshold inquiry is whether the State breached the plea agreement. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
de novo. Id. The threshold inquiry is whether the State breached the plea agreement. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
2008 WI APP 90
review de novo. State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116, 124, 589 N.W.2d 370 (1999). In most circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14
review de novo. State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116, 124, 589 N.W.2d 370 (1999). In most circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 We review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
¶6 We review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
Frontsheet
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
Kelly S. Lee v. James M. Kent
and depends on the father here to provide for what was claimed.” [4] No testimony was taken at the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2779 - 2005-03-31
and depends on the father here to provide for what was claimed.” [4] No testimony was taken at the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2779 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jo A. Kain
is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See id. Kain fails to establish the first two elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31
is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See id. Kain fails to establish the first two elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31