Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. State v. Truax, 2009 WI App 60, ¶8, 318 Wis. 2d 113, 767 N.W.2d 369. ¶6 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233836 - 2019-01-30
we review de novo. State v. Truax, 2009 WI App 60, ¶8, 318 Wis. 2d 113, 767 N.W.2d 369. ¶6 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233836 - 2019-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶36. However, the determination of whether a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175633 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶36. However, the determination of whether a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Maurice Clark
, are questions of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis.2d 522, 525, 496 N.W.2d 215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12328 - 2014-09-15
, are questions of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Jankowski, 173 Wis.2d 522, 525, 496 N.W.2d 215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12328 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christ Groh
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶8 Brar argues that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171425 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶8 Brar argues that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Andree Gentry v. Susan J. Wilson, M.D.
standards. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis. 2d 737, 748, 470 N.W.2d 625 (1991). Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2614 - 2017-09-19
standards. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis. 2d 737, 748, 470 N.W.2d 625 (1991). Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2614 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 107
believed that the use of a police department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53820 - 2014-09-15
believed that the use of a police department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but the circuit court’s determination of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. State v. Richter, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275826 - 2020-08-06
, but the circuit court’s determination of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. State v. Richter, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275826 - 2020-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107325 - 2014-01-22
for reconsideration raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107325 - 2014-01-22