Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 44408 for name change.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 44408 for name change.
Angela M.W. v. William Kruzicki
“removing the above-named unborn child from his or her present custody, and placing the unborn child
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17056 - 2005-03-31
“removing the above-named unborn child from his or her present custody, and placing the unborn child
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17056 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rules Petition 09-07
of the Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules. The reasons for this petition and a description of the proposed change
/supreme/docs/0907petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
of the Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules. The reasons for this petition and a description of the proposed change
/supreme/docs/0907petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
Dona M. Konrady v. Bremer Insurance Agencies, Inc.
Bremer’s motion to change the verdict’s answers or, alternatively, to grant a new trial. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3404 - 2005-03-31
Bremer’s motion to change the verdict’s answers or, alternatively, to grant a new trial. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Doris B.
of the amendments. See id. §§ 51, 52. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10273 - 2017-09-20
of the amendments. See id. §§ 51, 52. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10273 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a fixed-price to a time and materials basis. According to Zeitler, Greve wanted to change to time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101288 - 2013-08-26
a fixed-price to a time and materials basis. According to Zeitler, Greve wanted to change to time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101288 - 2013-08-26
[PDF]
Jon R. Woodard v. Pammy L. Woodard
as they existed at the time of the divorce with the current facts in light of the substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7142 - 2017-09-20
as they existed at the time of the divorce with the current facts in light of the substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7142 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Doris B.
of the amendments. See id. §§ 51, 52. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10274 - 2017-09-20
of the amendments. See id. §§ 51, 52. The statutory changes took effect on May 5, 1994. The amendments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10274 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Cauley
, was it a cause of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9637 - 2017-09-19
, was it a cause of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9637 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Linda R. Cauley
, was it a cause of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9590 - 2017-09-19
, was it a cause of Michael's change of plea. The court addressed the second question directly. It held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9590 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven Derkson v. Troy Haarstick
it denied his motion to change the jury’s answers to special verdict questions 5, 6, 7, and 8. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19
it denied his motion to change the jury’s answers to special verdict questions 5, 6, 7, and 8. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19