Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 72819 for we.
Search results 14231 - 14240 of 72819 for we.
State v. John S. Spicer
of trial counsel. We reject all of Spicer’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 Spicer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
of trial counsel. We reject all of Spicer’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 Spicer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
CA Blank Order
judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
Prairie Harbor Yacht Club Condominium Owners' Association, Inc. v. The Marine Group, LLC
The Marine Group. Because we conclude that the lien filed by Prairie Harbor was valid, and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6637 - 2005-03-31
The Marine Group. Because we conclude that the lien filed by Prairie Harbor was valid, and that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6637 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott L. Zimmermann
unreasonable, it must be satisfied that the refusal was a “knowing” withdrawal of his implied consent. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12156 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable, it must be satisfied that the refusal was a “knowing” withdrawal of his implied consent. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12156 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Because we conclude the trial court properly denied Hallet’s suppression motion, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49114 - 2010-04-19
. Because we conclude the trial court properly denied Hallet’s suppression motion, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49114 - 2010-04-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we located issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150697 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we located issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150697 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable suspicion to stop McGhee under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). We affirm. ¶2 The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30396 - 2007-09-26
a reasonable suspicion to stop McGhee under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). We affirm. ¶2 The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30396 - 2007-09-26
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91639 - 2013-01-14
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91639 - 2013-01-14