Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14241 - 14250 of 68814 for had.

State v. James R. Beckerson
In August 2003, Beckerson filed a postconviction motion.[1] He argued that the court had no jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7036 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ryan C. Krupp
house charge both arose from the search of a residence in which Krupp had recently lived. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5986 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Walworth v. Stephen F. Meyer
to ยง 346.63(1)(b).1 Meyer argues on appeal that (1) the Village failed to prove that the police had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13548 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ryan E. Brockman
. The driver was Ryan Brockman. Wiessinger smelled intoxicants on Brockman's breath and asked if he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9283 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Natalie described several incidents that occurred in an apartment where she and Strong had once resided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258871 - 2020-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The court found Christensen had understood at the time of the plea that the sentencing judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317120 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at the June 4, 2024 hearing. During the hearing, the circuit court found that the Smiths had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
friend, who had been killed the night before. One of the officers, Jeffrey Cline, testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74744 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James F. Blask
. The referee, Attorney Kathleen Callan Brady, had told Attorney Blask that the rules applicable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21

State v. Randy S. Ertman
that the arresting officer had violated his right to seek alternative testing under the implied consent law. Ertman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11034 - 2005-03-31