Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 64983 for b's.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 64983 for b's.
[PDF]
Brown County v. Heather M. A.
of abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) ….” Abuse in § 48.02(1)(b) includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6318 - 2017-09-19
of abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) ….” Abuse in § 48.02(1)(b) includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6318 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
alcohol concentration (PAC) contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). She additionally appeals from an order deeming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
alcohol concentration (PAC) contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). She additionally appeals from an order deeming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
COURT OF APPEALS
in Wis. Stat. § 904.04(2)(b), evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64699 - 2011-05-24
in Wis. Stat. § 904.04(2)(b), evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64699 - 2011-05-24
[PDF]
Dwight Zietlow v. David Stokes
in § 799.01, STATS., the person filing the counterclaim shall pay the fee prescribed under § 814.62(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8570 - 2017-09-19
in § 799.01, STATS., the person filing the counterclaim shall pay the fee prescribed under § 814.62(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hall
enhancement under § 346.65(2)(b). He contends that his motion to collaterally attack the prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19
enhancement under § 346.65(2)(b). He contends that his motion to collaterally attack the prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if committed by an adult. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)2., 961.42(1), 941.29(2)(b) (2013-14). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138602 - 2017-09-21
if committed by an adult. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)2., 961.42(1), 941.29(2)(b) (2013-14). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138602 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
on the briefs of Mark B. Pollack and Maria S. Lazar of Galanis, Pollack & Jacobs, S.C. of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7584 - 2017-09-19
on the briefs of Mark B. Pollack and Maria S. Lazar of Galanis, Pollack & Jacobs, S.C. of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7584 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
$613.28 as of August 12, 2005. ¶18 IT IS ORDERED that Attorney Seth B. Hartigan is publicly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2005-12-12
$613.28 as of August 12, 2005. ¶18 IT IS ORDERED that Attorney Seth B. Hartigan is publicly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), 939.50(3)(b)-(c) (2011-12). 1 The circuit court had statutory authority to require him to spend sixty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104259 - 2017-09-21
), 939.50(3)(b)-(c) (2011-12). 1 The circuit court had statutory authority to require him to spend sixty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2015 OWI Guidelines District 5
Forfeiture: $150 - $300 [§346.65(2)(am)1] Revocation: 6-9 months [§343.30(1q)(b)2] Occupational
/publications/fees/docs/d5owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
Forfeiture: $150 - $300 [§346.65(2)(am)1] Revocation: 6-9 months [§343.30(1q)(b)2] Occupational
/publications/fees/docs/d5owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02