Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo.” City of S. Milwaukee v. Kester, 2013 WI App 50, ¶13, 347 Wis. 2d 334, 346, 830 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729700 - 2023-11-16
review de novo.” City of S. Milwaukee v. Kester, 2013 WI App 50, ¶13, 347 Wis. 2d 334, 346, 830 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729700 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767300 - 2024-02-28
counsel’s conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767300 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo.” Fond du Lac Cnty. v. Helen E.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140353 - 2017-09-21
. “The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo.” Fond du Lac Cnty. v. Helen E.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140353 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Here, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638090 - 2023-03-29
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Here, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638090 - 2023-03-29
State v. Paul M. Nigl
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6220 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
CA Blank Order
of review: we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146730 - 2015-08-17
of review: we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146730 - 2015-08-17
Daniel Gage v. John Hagen
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law to facts de novo. See id., ¶17. ¶10 As Purtell makes clear, he does not challenge the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
of law to facts de novo. See id., ¶17. ¶10 As Purtell makes clear, he does not challenge the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether we apply a “clearly erroneous” or “de novo” standard of review. Thus, we do not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
of whether we apply a “clearly erroneous” or “de novo” standard of review. Thus, we do not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05