Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 29978 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 29978 for consulta de causas.
Viola G. Bodach v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
that a taxpayer is entitled to a de novo proceeding in the circuit court on a § 74.37, Stats., claim. See S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
that a taxpayer is entitled to a de novo proceeding in the circuit court on a § 74.37, Stats., claim. See S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor M. Kennedy
review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69, 76 (1996). We may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11216 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69, 76 (1996). We may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11216 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115439 - 2014-07-01
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115439 - 2014-07-01
[PDF]
WI APP 163
and apply them to undisputed facts de novo. Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501 N.W.2d 824 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15
and apply them to undisputed facts de novo. Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501 N.W.2d 824 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the limitation on cross-examination violates that right is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74965 - 2014-09-15
the limitation on cross-examination violates that right is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74965 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo. See id. ¶8 In sum, controlling law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo. See id. ¶8 In sum, controlling law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Ameen
N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, we value a trial court’s decision in spite of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13810 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, we value a trial court’s decision in spite of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13810 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Konkel v. Town of Elba Town Board
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. See id. ¶14 We need not address both elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605963 - 2022-12-29
determination that this court decides de novo. See id. ¶14 We need not address both elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605963 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
Jennie K. Vasen v. Progressive Insurance Companies
filed suit. ¶6 We review a summary judgment order de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21
filed suit. ¶6 We review a summary judgment order de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21