Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
[PDF]
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on certiorari review, a court does not reweigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. See Roberts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350062 - 2021-03-30
on certiorari review, a court does not reweigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. See Roberts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350062 - 2021-03-30
State v. City of Rhinelander
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Gage v. John Hagen
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
State v. Miyosha K. White
of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 149
to invalidate the same document. David appeals. Discussion ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28862 - 2007-06-26
to invalidate the same document. David appeals. Discussion ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28862 - 2007-06-26