Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14251 - 14260 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
reason to overcome the procedural bar of Escalona-Naranjo is a question of law that the court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
reason to overcome the procedural bar of Escalona-Naranjo is a question of law that the court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542869 - 2022-07-13
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542869 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
Whether something constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6100 - 2017-09-19
Whether something constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6100 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82768 - 2012-05-22
counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82768 - 2012-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review Lopez’s sentencing credit claim de novo. State v. Kitt, 2015 WI App 9, ¶3, 359 Wis. 2d 592, 859
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14
review Lopez’s sentencing credit claim de novo. State v. Kitt, 2015 WI App 9, ¶3, 359 Wis. 2d 592, 859
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14
Badger Contracting, Inc. v. John Harwood
The interpretation of a contract is a question of law we review de novo. See Cardinal v. Leader Nat. Ins. Co., 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15315 - 2005-03-31
The interpretation of a contract is a question of law we review de novo. See Cardinal v. Leader Nat. Ins. Co., 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15315 - 2005-03-31
Janice M. Eilola v. Linda Hattlestad
the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Capitol Indem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15254 - 2005-03-31
the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Capitol Indem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15254 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Peterson, 2001 WI App 220, ¶¶12-13, 247 Wis. 2d 871, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132254 - 2014-12-29
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Peterson, 2001 WI App 220, ¶¶12-13, 247 Wis. 2d 871, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132254 - 2014-12-29
CA Blank Order
they were denied the opportunity to submit arguments to the court. Moreover, we review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
they were denied the opportunity to submit arguments to the court. Moreover, we review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05