Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14261 - 14270 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14261 - 14270 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Jeffrey Ernstmeyer v. Rodney Sussek
Insurance Company from his personal injury lawsuit. He claims the trial court erred in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15097 - 2005-03-31
Insurance Company from his personal injury lawsuit. He claims the trial court erred in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15097 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chad L. Edwards
. Consequently, there was no basis for a theft charge. The trial court, therefore, denied the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12113 - 2005-03-31
. Consequently, there was no basis for a theft charge. The trial court, therefore, denied the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12113 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Casteel
argues that we should not review Casteel’s appeal. The State claims that Casteel’s appeal is an unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14221 - 2005-03-31
argues that we should not review Casteel’s appeal. The State claims that Casteel’s appeal is an unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14221 - 2005-03-31
Donald Minniecheske v. Village of Tigerton
their complaint. The judgment is affirmed. The appellants filed a small claims complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9897 - 2010-11-11
their complaint. The judgment is affirmed. The appellants filed a small claims complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9897 - 2010-11-11
Robert Keith v. Joshuah C. Harner
. ¶3 Keith signed a sworn notice of claim, but at that time did not know Harner’s name. He soon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7274 - 2005-03-31
. ¶3 Keith signed a sworn notice of claim, but at that time did not know Harner’s name. He soon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Casteel
, the State argues that we should not review Casteel’s appeal. The State claims that Casteel’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14221 - 2014-09-15
, the State argues that we should not review Casteel’s appeal. The State claims that Casteel’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14221 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not identified by witnesses, Buckner claimed that the complaint was not supported by probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
was not identified by witnesses, Buckner claimed that the complaint was not supported by probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
CA Blank Order
court also asked the victim several questions regarding his $2500 restitution claim. After hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92723 - 2013-02-06
court also asked the victim several questions regarding his $2500 restitution claim. After hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92723 - 2013-02-06
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court denied the motion, concluding that Robinson’s claims were barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143720 - 2013-01-17
. The circuit court denied the motion, concluding that Robinson’s claims were barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143720 - 2013-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to vacate a judgment of conviction or order a new trial. We conclude that Rhodes’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30086 - 2007-08-27
motion to vacate a judgment of conviction or order a new trial. We conclude that Rhodes’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30086 - 2007-08-27