Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14271 - 14280 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14271 - 14280 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Robert J. Waldron
, which we review de novo.” Id., ¶11. ¶10 Wisconsin JI—Criminal 830, privilege of defense of others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20096 - 2005-11-01
, which we review de novo.” Id., ¶11. ¶10 Wisconsin JI—Criminal 830, privilege of defense of others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20096 - 2005-11-01
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional fact which we review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶6 Coleman argues two issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19
is a constitutional fact which we review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶6 Coleman argues two issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19
State v. Jerome W.
of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
State v. Tonia L. Munz
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11464 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11464 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vickie L. Shipler
) and 973.03(4). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, subject to our de novo review. Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31
) and 973.03(4). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, subject to our de novo review. Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described exactly the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60990 - 2014-09-15
of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described exactly the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60990 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8481 - 2017-09-19
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8481 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo. State v. Felix, 2012 WI 36, ¶22, 339 Wis. 2d 670, 811 N.W.2d 775
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585538 - 2022-11-03
principles to those facts de novo. State v. Felix, 2012 WI 36, ¶22, 339 Wis. 2d 670, 811 N.W.2d 775
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585538 - 2022-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the undisputed findings of fact is a question of law, which I review de novo. See Mudrovich v. Soto, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181722 - 2017-09-21
to the undisputed findings of fact is a question of law, which I review de novo. See Mudrovich v. Soto, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Catina A. McCoy
are undisputed, this court reviews the trial court's legal conclusion de novo. State v. Goodrum, 152 Wis.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
are undisputed, this court reviews the trial court's legal conclusion de novo. State v. Goodrum, 152 Wis.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20