Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14271 - 14280 of 83455 for simple case search.

[PDF] NOTICE
to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and finally he contends that the gravity of his offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34114 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and finally he contends that the gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34114 - 2008-09-30

Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2764 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14545 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. This led Barton to search the house for E.M. E.M. called out, “I’m right here.” Barton found E.M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291067 - 2020-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Frausto searched the house for the safe or cash. Parker kept “squirming around,” so Hughes pressed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=351148 - 2021-03-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or the legal conclusion of the circuit court. Instead, we find a separate reason justifying the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403004 - 2021-07-30

[PDF] NOTICE
contract. After various pretrial motions, the case proceeded to trial on the Estate’s claims and Shaw’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39397 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
contract. After various pretrial motions, the case proceeded to trial on the Estate’s claims and Shaw’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39397 - 2009-08-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, an appellate court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27271 - 2006-11-27