Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14281 - 14290 of 63769 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 14281 - 14290 of 63769 for Motion for joint custody.
2008 WI App 129
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33463 - 2008-08-26
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33463 - 2008-08-26
[PDF]
WI App 129
The Honorable Charles F. Kahn denied Michael Anthony King’s motion to suppress. The Honorable Joseph R. Wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33463 - 2014-09-15
The Honorable Charles F. Kahn denied Michael Anthony King’s motion to suppress. The Honorable Joseph R. Wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33463 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 30
) appeals from an order of the circuit court granting a motion for declaratory/summary judgment filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788828 - 2024-06-20
) appeals from an order of the circuit court granting a motion for declaratory/summary judgment filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788828 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
December 6, 2012
a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion for purposes of the successive motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90061 - 2014-09-15
a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion for purposes of the successive motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted cases 2011AP1121 and 2011AP1566
a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion for purposes of the successive motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90779 - 2014-09-15
a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion for purposes of the successive motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decisions in 2010AP2313, 2010AP2597-CR and 2011AP914
/ Cty CA Decision 2010AP425 State v. Tramell E. Starks Whether a defendant’s motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91427 - 2014-09-15
/ Cty CA Decision 2010AP425 State v. Tramell E. Starks Whether a defendant’s motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91427 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We reverse. ¶2 Savage was charged with "violation of sex
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318626 - 2021-03-01
postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We reverse. ¶2 Savage was charged with "violation of sex
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318626 - 2021-03-01
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
, STATS. On February 1, 1996, Sprosty filed a motion for supervised release. At his evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
, STATS. On February 1, 1996, Sprosty filed a motion for supervised release. At his evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
was set for December 30, 1996, at which time the trial court granted Luedke’s motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
was set for December 30, 1996, at which time the trial court granted Luedke’s motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We agree with Hoffman that his theory of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4483 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We agree with Hoffman that his theory of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4483 - 2017-09-19