Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14281 - 14290 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14281 - 14290 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
retained competency, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
retained competency, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
Rick Keiting v. Mike Skauge
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9529 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9529 - 2005-03-31
City of Nekoosa v. Steven J. Melin
questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15652 - 2005-03-31
questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15652 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶10 Our review of the grant of a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128303 - 2014-11-18
. ¶10 Our review of the grant of a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128303 - 2014-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9. ¶6 The principles of law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9. ¶6 The principles of law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
State v. Michael R. Rydeski
review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546 N.W.2d 176, 180 (Ct. App. 1996). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11977 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546 N.W.2d 176, 180 (Ct. App. 1996). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11977 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason S. Petri
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110385 - 2014-04-15
a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110385 - 2014-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald G. Kester
to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11168 - 2017-09-19
to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11168 - 2017-09-19