Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14281 - 14290 of 16117 for probate.
Search results 14281 - 14290 of 16117 for probate.
2009 WI APP 74
, to be served consecutively. The court then placed Koll on probation for three years and ordered him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35974 - 2011-06-14
, to be served consecutively. The court then placed Koll on probation for three years and ordered him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35974 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
Galvin was Roberts’ probation and parole agent. She testified about exhibit number 4, a “case history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28380 - 2007-03-12
Galvin was Roberts’ probation and parole agent. She testified about exhibit number 4, a “case history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28380 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
WI APP 33
that the motion to compel in that probate action was a “preliminary contested matter,” the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259962 - 2020-07-09
that the motion to compel in that probate action was a “preliminary contested matter,” the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259962 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, PROBATION, OR EXTENDED SUPERVISION. …. (b) …. 2. If an aided person
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16
, PROBATION, OR EXTENDED SUPERVISION. …. (b) …. 2. If an aided person
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16
CA Blank Order
the constitutionality of Wis. Stat. § 973.10(2) (1995-96), which permitted administrative revocation of probation. [9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134789 - 2015-02-10
the constitutionality of Wis. Stat. § 973.10(2) (1995-96), which permitted administrative revocation of probation. [9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134789 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
WI APP 138
580, 587, 326 N.W.2d 768 (1982) (reversal where revocation of probation was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71185 - 2014-09-15
580, 587, 326 N.W.2d 768 (1982) (reversal where revocation of probation was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Probate Court. Alicia argued that Marcus abandoned Brandon within the meaning of WIS. STAT. § 852.14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242865 - 2019-07-31
Probate Court. Alicia argued that Marcus abandoned Brandon within the meaning of WIS. STAT. § 852.14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242865 - 2019-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the State’s agreement to recommend probation. She testified that she was present during parts of meetings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27330 - 2014-09-15
on the State’s agreement to recommend probation. She testified that she was present during parts of meetings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27330 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
advises that her investigation reveals nothing to suggest that the plea bargain included a probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
advises that her investigation reveals nothing to suggest that the plea bargain included a probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the State’s witnesses: Lindsey Galvin, Sheila Fields, and Anthony Jurek. ¶6 Galvin was Roberts’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28380 - 2014-09-15
of the State’s witnesses: Lindsey Galvin, Sheila Fields, and Anthony Jurek. ¶6 Galvin was Roberts’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28380 - 2014-09-15