Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14291 - 14300 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 14291 - 14300 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Randy J. Stahl
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence modification and so treated the motion as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27314 - 2006-12-04
that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence modification and so treated the motion as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27314 - 2006-12-04
Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
Andrew S. Zieve appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claim against a South
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9361 - 2005-03-31
Andrew S. Zieve appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claim against a South
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9361 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not give a sufficient reason why he did not raise his claims in his first § 974.06 motion. See State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185364 - 2017-09-21
not give a sufficient reason why he did not raise his claims in his first § 974.06 motion. See State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
No. 2004AP3348-CR 2 court reasoned that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27314 - 2014-09-15
No. 2004AP3348-CR 2 court reasoned that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27314 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d at 181. Claims that could have been raised on direct appeal or by prior motion are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04
Wis. 2d at 181. Claims that could have been raised on direct appeal or by prior motion are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of Ackerman for a then-pending paternity action. Przytarski sued Ackerman, claiming that he breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
of Ackerman for a then-pending paternity action. Przytarski sued Ackerman, claiming that he breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate proceedings are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36147 - 2014-09-15
) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate proceedings are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36147 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36147 - 2009-04-13
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36147 - 2009-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the prosecutor out-of-context as arguing the victim was truthful in her testimony and claims that these comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673185 - 2023-06-27
the prosecutor out-of-context as arguing the victim was truthful in her testimony and claims that these comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673185 - 2023-06-27