Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14291 - 14300 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14291 - 14300 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
State v. Jason S. Petri
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Ameen
N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, we value a trial court’s decision in spite of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13810 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, we value a trial court’s decision in spite of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13810 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
N.W.2d 433. This presents a question of law, which a reviewing court reviews under the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27843 - 2007-01-22
N.W.2d 433. This presents a question of law, which a reviewing court reviews under the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27843 - 2007-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
Louise Sterlinske v. School District of Bruce
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d 75, 79, 450 N.W.2d 249, 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11413 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d 75, 79, 450 N.W.2d 249, 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11413 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17
State v. James W.
“clearly erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25338 - 2006-05-30
“clearly erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25338 - 2006-05-30
State v. Joshua Jenkins
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21