Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14291 - 14300 of 58303 for speedy trial.
Search results 14291 - 14300 of 58303 for speedy trial.
State v. Louis E. Guerra
was not advised of his right to a jury trial. The trial court denied Guerra’s motion to collaterally attack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2878 - 2005-03-31
was not advised of his right to a jury trial. The trial court denied Guerra’s motion to collaterally attack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2878 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cornell Clark
convicting him of delivering cocaine and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
convicting him of delivering cocaine and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to sever the trial of the charges against him. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26755 - 2006-10-16
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to sever the trial of the charges against him. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26755 - 2006-10-16
State v. Michael K. Stavlo
conclude that the trial court properly denied Stavlo’s sentence modification motion without a hearing, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10660 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court properly denied Stavlo’s sentence modification motion without a hearing, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10660 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mario Harris
the judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct—use of dangerous weapon, following a jury trial,[2] and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16183 - 2005-03-31
the judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct—use of dangerous weapon, following a jury trial,[2] and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of attempted first-degree intentional homicide and armed robbery. For the homicide, the trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33892 - 2014-09-15
of attempted first-degree intentional homicide and armed robbery. For the homicide, the trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33892 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide and armed robbery. For the homicide, the trial court imposed a forty-year prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33892 - 2008-09-02
intentional homicide and armed robbery. For the homicide, the trial court imposed a forty-year prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33892 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
State v. James T. Rogers
from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13955 - 2014-09-15
from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13955 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Stewart
, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury. The prosecution charged that Stewart had ordered a gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury. The prosecution charged that Stewart had ordered a gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Reuter’s presentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Reuter’s presentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15