Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1431 - 1440 of 29714 for des.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review the circuit court grant of summary judgment de novo. Johnson, 324 Wis. 2d 366, ¶7. Review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239707 - 2019-04-23

[PDF] WI APP 156
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29100 - 2014-09-15

Wayne G. Tatge v. Chambers & Owen, Inc.
de novo and use the same methodology as the trial court. Envirologix Corp. v. City of Waukesha, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9862 - 2005-03-31

Rubidell Resort Condominium Association, Inc. v. James Welch
commissioner conducted a trial, according to the small claims procedure in use in Milwaukee County, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2718 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner held a hearing and dismissed the case. Keyes and Gruner filed a demand for trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] The Role of Defense Counsel in Drug Courts
an approach which relies on a de- fense attorney to provide coun- sel to the drug court “program.” We have
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/defensecounsel.pdf - 2023-09-21

Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2813 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 100
) contemplates a de novo review of the City’s decision. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86314 - 2014-09-15

Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31

Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2814 - 2005-03-31