Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1431 - 1440 of 26689 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Search results 1431 - 1440 of 26689 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Judith A. Pinchar
an $8820.75 settlement check relating to a second client. Attorney Pinchar disbursed $7112.22
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16686 - 2017-09-21
an $8820.75 settlement check relating to a second client. Attorney Pinchar disbursed $7112.22
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a marital property agreement, and a document entitled “Donald A. Fanetti and Marilyn J. Fanetti 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110527 - 2017-09-21
, a marital property agreement, and a document entitled “Donald A. Fanetti and Marilyn J. Fanetti 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110527 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
wills, a marital property agreement, and a document entitled “Donald A. Fanetti and Marilyn J. Fanetti
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110527 - 2014-04-21
wills, a marital property agreement, and a document entitled “Donald A. Fanetti and Marilyn J. Fanetti
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110527 - 2014-04-21
[PDF]
Kathy Jo Strittmater v. Dale P. Strittmater
’ marital debt; and (5) whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion in ordering Kramer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13545 - 2017-09-21
’ marital debt; and (5) whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion in ordering Kramer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13545 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in an incorrect valuation of the debt on the marital home and incorrect equalization payment. ¶2 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109568 - 2017-09-21
in an incorrect valuation of the debt on the marital home and incorrect equalization payment. ¶2 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109568 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
request. ¶3 The circuit court disagreed. It found that “the [settlement] agreement ... covers all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52903 - 2010-08-02
request. ¶3 The circuit court disagreed. It found that “the [settlement] agreement ... covers all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52903 - 2010-08-02
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Russell Goldstein
Goldstein a $1000 retainer. There was no written fee agreement. No. 03-0523-D 17 ¶47
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16729 - 2017-09-21
Goldstein a $1000 retainer. There was no written fee agreement. No. 03-0523-D 17 ¶47
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16729 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the District after concluding that a settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into by Wruck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976692 - 2025-07-02
to the District after concluding that a settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into by Wruck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976692 - 2025-07-02
2009 WI App 183
objection to the will, and it was admitted into probate. There was no language in the settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15
objection to the will, and it was admitted into probate. There was no language in the settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
. Carroll then commingled $1000 of his personal funds into the trust account to cover the payment. (4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16389 - 2005-03-31
. Carroll then commingled $1000 of his personal funds into the trust account to cover the payment. (4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16389 - 2005-03-31