Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14301 - 14310 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14301 - 14310 of 30191 for de.
State v. Darrell J. Shearer
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3739 - 2005-03-31
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3739 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987). However, we review de novo whether the circuit court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987). However, we review de novo whether the circuit court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
State v. Lee D. Worby
which we review de novo and without deference to the trial court. There is a presumption that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo and without deference to the trial court. There is a presumption that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶6 Sufficiency of evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51566 - 2010-06-30
of Review ¶6 Sufficiency of evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51566 - 2010-06-30
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
State v. Javier Salgado
, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144422 - 2015-07-13
N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144422 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-02
a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-02