Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14301 - 14310 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] James Freer v. Zimbrick, Inc.
. The case was tried to the court. The facts were substantially in dispute, but the court ultimately found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12914 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
directly to Dr. Goeckner. The cases were consolidated. ¶10 The case went before a jury. At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96733 - 2013-05-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was missing its file on Mayotte’s open felony case. ¶5 Officers subsequently executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23

Frontsheet
2009 WI 37 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2008AP446-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36600 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The judgment was entered by the Honorable William W. Brash, III, who presided over the case following judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96733 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of discretion on both evidentiary rulings and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15

Tamara G. Hernandez v. Randolph S. Allen
2005 WI App 247 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2696 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19917 - 2005-12-11

[PDF] WI 37
2009 WI 37 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2008AP446-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36600 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“stated that based on what it found to be aggravating circumstances in this case it did not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904998 - 2025-01-24