Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14301 - 14310 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Search results 14301 - 14310 of 58381 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
, and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion NO. 97-0936-CR 2 in not permitting use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21
, and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion NO. 97-0936-CR 2 in not permitting use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Constance Wolfgram v. Lewis E. Olson
, following a jury trial, awarding Constance Wolf, f/k/a Constance Wolfgram, No. 96-2297 2 damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11247 - 2017-09-19
, following a jury trial, awarding Constance Wolf, f/k/a Constance Wolfgram, No. 96-2297 2 damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James A. Tanksley
an order1 denying his motion for severance and separate trials for sexual assault charges involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16289 - 2017-09-21
an order1 denying his motion for severance and separate trials for sexual assault charges involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16289 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
, and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in not permitting use of a prior inconsistent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
, and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in not permitting use of a prior inconsistent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Stambaugh
of a civil injunction, contrary to § 785.01(1)(b), Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
of a civil injunction, contrary to § 785.01(1)(b), Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
counterclaimed that he owned title to the disputed parcels[2] by adverse possession based on tacking.[3] A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2010-03-24
counterclaimed that he owned title to the disputed parcels[2] by adverse possession based on tacking.[3] A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2010-03-24
[PDF]
Jay Morgan v. Diane M. Stewart
for framing. The trial court implicitly accepted the Morgans’ testimony and awarded them money damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11652 - 2017-09-19
for framing. The trial court implicitly accepted the Morgans’ testimony and awarded them money damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11652 - 2017-09-19
Lucy A. Goebel v. Henry S. Goebel
Henry and Lucy Goebel were married in 1990. Henry testified at trial that he and his mother purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15137 - 2005-03-31
Henry and Lucy Goebel were married in 1990. Henry testified at trial that he and his mother purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert K.
that the State had proven the grounds for termination in connection with each of the children. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
that the State had proven the grounds for termination in connection with each of the children. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
modification, but instead argued ineffective assistance of trial counsel in connection with his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18
modification, but instead argued ineffective assistance of trial counsel in connection with his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18