Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14311 - 14320 of 68874 for he.
Search results 14311 - 14320 of 68874 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Alternatively, he argues the reduction in sentence credit constituted a new factor No. 2014AP1671-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158066 - 2017-09-21
. Alternatively, he argues the reduction in sentence credit constituted a new factor No. 2014AP1671-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158066 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
. He has had prior administrative suspensions in 1991 and 1993, both followed by reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
. He has had prior administrative suspensions in 1991 and 1993, both followed by reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30118 - 2014-09-15
a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30118 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2006
is the background: Frederick Lee Pharm was living in Nevada in June 1976 when he was arrested and charged
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26406 - 2017-09-21
is the background: Frederick Lee Pharm was living in Nevada in June 1976 when he was arrested and charged
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26406 - 2017-09-21
State v. James F. Karls
a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jene R. Bodoh
as a dangerous weapon at the time of the injury. He claims that because the evidence shows he did not train
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12104 - 2005-03-31
as a dangerous weapon at the time of the injury. He claims that because the evidence shows he did not train
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12104 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was not subject to interrogation at the time he made the unrecorded statements during booking at the Dane County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98190 - 2013-06-12
was not subject to interrogation at the time he made the unrecorded statements during booking at the Dane County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98190 - 2013-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33862 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30118 - 2007-08-29
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30118 - 2007-08-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. Wilber argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Wilber argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15