Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14311 - 14320 of 52058 for legal separation.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.” Id.; State v. X.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771215 - 2024-03-06

[PDF] Rupena's, Inc. v. City of West Allis
” for the purposes of personal tax liability depends not on legal title but rather, upon who is the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2271 - 2017-09-19

State v. Harold Merryfield
challenges to subject matter jurisdiction based on legal questions, as opposed to those based on conflicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13906 - 2005-03-31

Terri L. Knowles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
and a 1989 Buick station wagon. State Farm insured both vehicles under separate policies. Anthony primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ethelyn I.C. v. Waukesha County
, and the fees of Ethelyn’s advocate counsel as well as Ethelyn’s conservator’s legal fees. Ethelyn now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 86
, Inc. nor Steven C. Northcott has filed separate briefs on this appeal. No. 2011AP2636 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83767 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the strangulation charge into two separate counts. The factual allegations were the same as in the prior case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621713 - 2023-02-15

State v. Harold Merryfield
challenges to subject matter jurisdiction based on legal questions, as opposed to those based on conflicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13905 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harold Merryfield
at 664 (noting distinction between challenges to subject matter jurisdiction based on legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13907 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. A. Legal Principles ¶27 The admissibility of evidence rests within the trial court’s discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29