Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14311 - 14320 of 58970 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14311 - 14320 of 58970 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
current claims for relief from the judgment of conviction are procedurally barred by the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244827 - 2019-08-06
current claims for relief from the judgment of conviction are procedurally barred by the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244827 - 2019-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
children. Wooden claimed that on the date of the offense, she and Herring had attended a party in Chicago
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
children. Wooden claimed that on the date of the offense, she and Herring had attended a party in Chicago
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
State v. John T. Neita
modification; and (5) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Neita claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9832 - 2017-09-19
modification; and (5) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Neita claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9832 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Cholewinski
A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. Cross v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19
A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. Cross v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that trial counsel was deficient when he “misadvised Mr. Jackson that he could continue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232957 - 2019-01-23
claimed that trial counsel was deficient when he “misadvised Mr. Jackson that he could continue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232957 - 2019-01-23
State v. Nels H. Rieth
) and 943.20(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
) and 943.20(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims this prejudice is shown by lesser sentences given by the circuit court to others convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196863 - 2017-09-21
claims this prejudice is shown by lesser sentences given by the circuit court to others convicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196863 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. He alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to claim trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144242 - 2015-07-06
for postconviction relief. He alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to claim trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144242 - 2015-07-06
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31