Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14321 - 14330 of 30077 for de.
Search results 14321 - 14330 of 30077 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
from the code phone. [3] Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40272 - 2009-08-31
from the code phone. [3] Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40272 - 2009-08-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s application of constitutional principles to those findings de novo. Id. ¶16 To be lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145329 - 2015-08-04
the court’s application of constitutional principles to those findings de novo. Id. ¶16 To be lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145329 - 2015-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The proper measure of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14
. The proper measure of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to begin the process. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621130 - 2023-02-15
to begin the process. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621130 - 2023-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 The remedy for a defendant who has been given an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30483 - 2007-10-09
of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 The remedy for a defendant who has been given an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30483 - 2007-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
followed. ¶9 “We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100616 - 2013-08-13
followed. ¶9 “We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100616 - 2013-08-13
State v. Douglas Lois
de novo. Id. Section 343.305(3)(a), Stats., provides in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8778 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. Section 343.305(3)(a), Stats., provides in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8778 - 2005-03-31