Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14331 - 14340 of 63782 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 14331 - 14340 of 63782 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Charles E. Carthage
the least degree of custody consistent with the goals of sentencing. See id. at 276. A sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6431 - 2005-03-31
the least degree of custody consistent with the goals of sentencing. See id. at 276. A sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Sieger
pornography charges. After a hearing, the court granted the State’s motion to join the two cases because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12702 - 2017-09-21
pornography charges. After a hearing, the court granted the State’s motion to join the two cases because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12702 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
motion for postconviction relief. We agree with Hoffman that his theory of defense instruction should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31
motion for postconviction relief. We agree with Hoffman that his theory of defense instruction should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Sieger
pornography charges. After a hearing, the court granted the State’s motion to join the two cases because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12700 - 2017-09-21
pornography charges. After a hearing, the court granted the State’s motion to join the two cases because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12700 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John P. Reddin v. Richard Galster
in the Jackson County Circuit Court. On a motion by the State, venue was ordered changed to Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11950 - 2017-09-21
in the Jackson County Circuit Court. On a motion by the State, venue was ordered changed to Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11950 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Gruentzel
, followed by twenty years of extended supervision. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
, followed by twenty years of extended supervision. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
omitted). In reviewing an order denying a motion for sentence modification, we also consider whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26
omitted). In reviewing an order denying a motion for sentence modification, we also consider whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 939.62(2). Defendant Kosinski was in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections in relation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144544 - 2017-09-21
. § 939.62(2). Defendant Kosinski was in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections in relation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144544 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
980, Stats. On February 1, 1996, Sprosty filed a motion for supervised release. At his evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13344 - 2005-03-31
980, Stats. On February 1, 1996, Sprosty filed a motion for supervised release. At his evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13344 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that part of a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion. Steiskal contends he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
, and that part of a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion. Steiskal contends he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04