Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14331 - 14340 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14331 - 14340 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
does not contravene public policy, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. Ross v. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79943 - 2012-03-27
does not contravene public policy, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. Ross v. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79943 - 2012-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56196 - 2010-11-01
is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56196 - 2010-11-01
Town of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2458 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact unless “clearly erroneous,” and reviews de novo “the application of those facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=807970 - 2024-05-31
findings of fact unless “clearly erroneous,” and reviews de novo “the application of those facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=807970 - 2024-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d 668
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d 668
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
State v. Deann K. Baer
, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Lentz’s accounts of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60990 - 2011-03-14
and Lentz’s accounts of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60990 - 2011-03-14