Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14331 - 14340 of 72987 for we.
Search results 14331 - 14340 of 72987 for we.
[PDF]
State v. James A. Munsch
brief, we decided State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199, 238 Wis. 2d 666, 618 N.W.2d 240, review denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15768 - 2017-09-21
brief, we decided State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199, 238 Wis. 2d 666, 618 N.W.2d 240, review denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15768 - 2017-09-21
State v. Raymond T. Golden
. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31
. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31
State v. Algen M. Lamon
Lamon’s trial counsel ineffectively represented him. We affirm. ¶2 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5909 - 2005-03-31
Lamon’s trial counsel ineffectively represented him. We affirm. ¶2 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5909 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce R. Polczynski
offense. We conclude that probation is not available. We reverse and remand for resentencing. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2601 - 2005-03-31
offense. We conclude that probation is not available. We reverse and remand for resentencing. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2601 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Wideman
the sentence. 4 The court of appeals affirmed the judgment and order of the circuit court. We affirm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16999 - 2017-09-21
the sentence. 4 The court of appeals affirmed the judgment and order of the circuit court. We affirm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Tetting was charged with two counts of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195512 - 2017-09-21
. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Tetting was charged with two counts of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195512 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clifford Muchow v. Richard Goding
Corporation (EDS), a subrogated party-plaintiff, appeals from the same order. We affirm in part and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7760 - 2017-09-19
Corporation (EDS), a subrogated party-plaintiff, appeals from the same order. We affirm in part and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7760 - 2017-09-19
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State
Center (WRC), and the administrators of those agencies.[1] For the reasons discussed below, we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2245 - 2005-03-31
Center (WRC), and the administrators of those agencies.[1] For the reasons discussed below, we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2245 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reconfinement sentence. We affirm because: (1) Hoerig has not identified “new factors” that would justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44796 - 2010-02-10
reconfinement sentence. We affirm because: (1) Hoerig has not identified “new factors” that would justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44796 - 2010-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Avery
trial would be different, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. Avery additionally contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
trial would be different, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. Avery additionally contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19