Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 30077 for de.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 30077 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
authority such as this raises an issue of law that we review de novo. R.W.S. v. State, 162 Wis. 2d 862, 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131840 - 2014-12-22
authority such as this raises an issue of law that we review de novo. R.W.S. v. State, 162 Wis. 2d 862, 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131840 - 2014-12-22
Shawano County v. Bermuda A. H.
Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Wisconsin Fin. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2755 - 2005-03-31
Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Wisconsin Fin. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2755 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel R. Nehring
which we review de novo. State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis. 2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3807 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis. 2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3807 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
Frontsheet
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id. Finally, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92089 - 2013-01-24
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id. Finally, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92089 - 2013-01-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the court’s authority� to which we apply a de novo standard of review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
of the court’s authority� to which we apply a de novo standard of review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶8; Hughes, 233 Wis. 2d 280, ¶15. In the second step, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶8; Hughes, 233 Wis. 2d 280, ¶15. In the second step, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and their application to a particular set of facts is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
and their application to a particular set of facts is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23