Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was violated because the State did not test the ignition key for fingerprints at all before the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
was violated because the State did not test the ignition key for fingerprints at all before the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and further testing confirmed that the blood found on the glass sliver came from Russell. On cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53135 - 2014-09-15
, and further testing confirmed that the blood found on the glass sliver came from Russell. On cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53135 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
right to due process was violated because the State did not test the ignition key for fingerprints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
right to due process was violated because the State did not test the ignition key for fingerprints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his nonconsensual, warrantless blood test should have been suppressed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166319 - 2017-09-21
of his nonconsensual, warrantless blood test should have been suppressed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166319 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Joseph Chaulklin
tests because, according to Beaver's testimony, Chaulklin told the officers that he had hurt his legs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8858 - 2017-09-19
tests because, according to Beaver's testimony, Chaulklin told the officers that he had hurt his legs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8858 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ronald J. Anderson
in their boats, Cross asked Anderson whether he would agree to submit to some field sobriety tests, and he said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15470 - 2005-03-31
in their boats, Cross asked Anderson whether he would agree to submit to some field sobriety tests, and he said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15470 - 2005-03-31
City of Oconomowoc v. Christopher E. Verburgt
that there was no probable cause to request a preliminary breath test (PBT).[2] Third, he challenges the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3971 - 2005-03-31
that there was no probable cause to request a preliminary breath test (PBT).[2] Third, he challenges the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3971 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Joseph Chaulklin
not have Chaulklin do any field-sobriety tests because, according to Beaver's testimony, Chaulklin told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8858 - 2005-03-31
not have Chaulklin do any field-sobriety tests because, according to Beaver's testimony, Chaulklin told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8858 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gino T. Gumphrey
, and administer a blood test confirming his intoxication. Gumphrey argues that had the police not searched his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26223 - 2006-08-15
, and administer a blood test confirming his intoxication. Gumphrey argues that had the police not searched his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26223 - 2006-08-15
[PDF]
Mark Price v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. The sample was tested by the Department of Corrections Drug Testing Center several days later, revealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
. The sample was tested by the Department of Corrections Drug Testing Center several days later, revealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19