Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Frontsheet
,[2] granted the defendant a new trial under its discretionary authority to reverse convictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143992 - 2006-09-05
,[2] granted the defendant a new trial under its discretionary authority to reverse convictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143992 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Stanley A. Samuel
the trial court’s order to the contrary. Our decision necessitates a reversal of all Samuel’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s order to the contrary. Our decision necessitates a reversal of all Samuel’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 256
. §§ 19.45(2) and 939.05.[2] Jensen contends that the trial court submitted an erroneous jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30828 - 2007-12-18
. §§ 19.45(2) and 939.05.[2] Jensen contends that the trial court submitted an erroneous jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30828 - 2007-12-18
WI App 142 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP85-CR Complete Titl...
on the videotaped interview presented at trial. We conclude there was no violation because the victim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70931 - 2011-10-18
on the videotaped interview presented at trial. We conclude there was no violation because the victim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70931 - 2011-10-18
State v. Stanley A. Samuel
that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2008-01-30
that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2008-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility of G.H. and J.H. N.J. contested the allegations, and a court trial was held on October 22-24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21
responsibility of G.H. and J.H. N.J. contested the allegations, and a court trial was held on October 22-24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the evidence introduced at the jury trial to support that first ground prejudiced his defense to the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242486 - 2019-06-20
) the evidence introduced at the jury trial to support that first ground prejudiced his defense to the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242486 - 2019-06-20
State v. David J. Clark
entered in the trial court on September 12, 2001. In the order, the trial court awarded Clark additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
entered in the trial court on September 12, 2001. In the order, the trial court awarded Clark additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick Martin
to suppress evidence discovered during a frisk of his person. Because the evidence was suppressed, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence discovered during a frisk of his person. Because the evidence was suppressed, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donavin Hemphill
was charged as indicated above. ¶4 Hemphill pled not guilty and the case proceeded to trial. Hemphill’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19482 - 2017-09-21
was charged as indicated above. ¶4 Hemphill pled not guilty and the case proceeded to trial. Hemphill’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19482 - 2017-09-21