Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14361 - 14370 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14361 - 14370 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103082 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103082 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Minnig
. § 346.61. 2 This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7466 - 2017-09-20
. § 346.61. 2 This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7466 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342440 - 2021-03-04
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342440 - 2021-03-04
[PDF]
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
present questions of law which we review de novo. See Revenue Dep’t v. Milwaukee Brewers, 111 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14961 - 2017-09-21
present questions of law which we review de novo. See Revenue Dep’t v. Milwaukee Brewers, 111 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14961 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional and statutory provisions are questions of law that we review de novo.” State v. Alexander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
of constitutional and statutory provisions are questions of law that we review de novo.” State v. Alexander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶10 Personal jurisdiction under Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559116 - 2022-08-30
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶10 Personal jurisdiction under Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559116 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Todd A. Wild
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297407 - 2020-10-20
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297407 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact that we review de novo without deference to the [circuit] court.” State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
fact that we review de novo without deference to the [circuit] court.” State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
manner”; and (4) for a “trial de novo.” The trial court denied these motions on January 17, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
manner”; and (4) for a “trial de novo.” The trial court denied these motions on January 17, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15