Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14361 - 14370 of 44385 for name change.
Search results 14361 - 14370 of 44385 for name change.
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Jo Ellen Burke, Jennie Tunkieicz and John Persa Motion to File Amicus Brief
so, this Court used “the least change approach.” Johnson III, 2022 WI 19, ¶ 3. Case 2023AP001399
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1108ellenbrief.pdf - 2023-11-08
so, this Court used “the least change approach.” Johnson III, 2022 WI 19, ¶ 3. Case 2023AP001399
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1108ellenbrief.pdf - 2023-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion asked the court to exercise its “discretionary authority” to change this finding. The motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
motion asked the court to exercise its “discretionary authority” to change this finding. The motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
State v. Sherry M. Klitzka
restitution. We therefore affirm the postjudgment order refusing to change Klitzka’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13244 - 2005-03-31
restitution. We therefore affirm the postjudgment order refusing to change Klitzka’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support may be made only upon a finding of a substantial change in circumstances. Rottscheit, 262 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185766 - 2017-09-21
support may be made only upon a finding of a substantial change in circumstances. Rottscheit, 262 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, in which the court denied his motion for change of venue and upheld a harassment injunction it previously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239999 - 2019-04-29
, in which the court denied his motion for change of venue and upheld a harassment injunction it previously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239999 - 2019-04-29
State v. Terry G. Smith
leading to the appeal are undisputed. On May 9, 1995, the trial court held a hearing in which it changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11868 - 2005-03-31
leading to the appeal are undisputed. On May 9, 1995, the trial court held a hearing in which it changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion asked the court to exercise its “discretionary authority” to change this finding. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
motion asked the court to exercise its “discretionary authority” to change this finding. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
there was a sufficient factual basis for Taylor’s plea; and (2) whether an alleged change in parole board policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2298 - 2017-09-19
there was a sufficient factual basis for Taylor’s plea; and (2) whether an alleged change in parole board policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2298 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian W. Shaw
violated when the trial court changed his sentence from eighteen months in the county jail to eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
violated when the trial court changed his sentence from eighteen months in the county jail to eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
factual basis for Taylor’s plea; and (2) whether an alleged change in parole board policy is a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
factual basis for Taylor’s plea; and (2) whether an alleged change in parole board policy is a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31