Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14371 - 14380 of 29970 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient factual basis is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12

John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews’ encounter with Cali
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131971 - 2014-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶10 Our review of the grant of a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128303 - 2014-11-18

[PDF] State v. Henry A. Phillips
presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gwen L.P.
governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10488 - 2017-09-20

Elyse Joransen-Hamilton Knutson v. Richard C. Knutson
and their application to a particular set of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2790 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lee D. Worby
which we review de novo and without deference to the trial court. There is a presumption that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and therefore we review that question de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21

Daniel Gage v. John Hagen
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31