Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14371 - 14380 of 24556 for extending.
Search results 14371 - 14380 of 24556 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Church
. No. 02-0462-CR 3 ¶4 The court sentenced Church to five years in prison and ten years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-0462-CR 3 ¶4 The court sentenced Church to five years in prison and ten years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a bifurcated sentence of confinement and extended supervision. We agree with appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105377 - 2017-09-21
of a bifurcated sentence of confinement and extended supervision. We agree with appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105377 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, to run concurrently. The sentences are well within the legal maximums
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359248 - 2021-04-22
of extended supervision, to run concurrently. The sentences are well within the legal maximums
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359248 - 2021-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Charles V. Royster
of initial confinement and one year of extended supervision. Defense counsel asked the court to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24971 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and one year of extended supervision. Defense counsel asked the court to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, with four years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. In deciding the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144238 - 2017-09-21
, with four years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. In deciding the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sentenced to the maximum—three years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203610 - 2017-11-29
was sentenced to the maximum—three years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203610 - 2017-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. In 2018, Luckett filed the motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. In 2018, Luckett filed the motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and three years’ extended supervision, imposed and stayed in favor of five years’ probation. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
confinement and three years’ extended supervision, imposed and stayed in favor of five years’ probation. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and twelve and one-half years of extended supervision. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
years of initial confinement and twelve and one-half years of extended supervision. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
The income-sharing arrangement outlined in the MSA was extended until January 1, 2007. On November 20, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89039 - 2012-11-05
The income-sharing arrangement outlined in the MSA was extended until January 1, 2007. On November 20, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89039 - 2012-11-05