Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14381 - 14390 of 30098 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14381 - 14390 of 30098 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26656 - 2006-10-03
of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26656 - 2006-10-03
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, and that is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2005-03-31
of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, and that is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bentura Martinez
of identification procedures raises an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilson, 179 Wis.2d 660, 682
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9312 - 2005-03-31
of identification procedures raises an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilson, 179 Wis.2d 660, 682
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9312 - 2005-03-31
WI App 124 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2538 Complete Title...
. Standard of Review. ¶7 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo. Nell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101938 - 2013-10-29
. Standard of Review. ¶7 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo. Nell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101938 - 2013-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
Carolyn A. Benson v. City of Ashland
, the reviewing court is obliged to review the evidence de novo to determine whether discretion was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3060 - 2005-03-31
, the reviewing court is obliged to review the evidence de novo to determine whether discretion was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3060 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brandon J. Green
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21