Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 17557 for ex.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 17557 for ex.
COURT OF APPEALS
to an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Estate of Hegarty ex rel. Hegarty v. Beauchaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64340 - 2011-05-16
to an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Estate of Hegarty ex rel. Hegarty v. Beauchaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64340 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
Duane Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
court. State ex rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Bd., 2002 WI App 64, ¶8, 252 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6034 - 2017-09-19
court. State ex rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Bd., 2002 WI App 64, ¶8, 252 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6034 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph Scaccio III
of conviction is supported by State ex rel. Marth v. Smith, 224 Wis. 2d 578, 592 N.W.2d 307 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2459 - 2005-03-31
of conviction is supported by State ex rel. Marth v. Smith, 224 Wis. 2d 578, 592 N.W.2d 307 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. If the meaning of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry.’” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709935 - 2023-10-03
. If the meaning of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry.’” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709935 - 2023-10-03
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
"is to determine what the statute means so that it may be given its full, proper, and intended effect." State ex
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
"is to determine what the statute means so that it may be given its full, proper, and intended effect." State ex
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
on direct appeal, citing State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59952 - 2011-02-14
on direct appeal, citing State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59952 - 2011-02-14
2007 WI APP 112
-26, 244 Wis. 2d 777, 629 N.W.2d 601; Delaware ex rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 244 A.2d 80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26
-26, 244 Wis. 2d 777, 629 N.W.2d 601; Delaware ex rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 244 A.2d 80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
ex rel. Goodchild v. Burke, 27 Wis. 2d 244, 133 N.W.2d 753 (1965). No. 2006AP2769-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
ex rel. Goodchild v. Burke, 27 Wis. 2d 244, 133 N.W.2d 753 (1965). No. 2006AP2769-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol, 2003 WI App 97, ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144176 - 2017-09-21
a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol, 2003 WI App 97, ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144176 - 2017-09-21
Heritage Bank & Trust v. Duane Dietsche
exercised its discretion. See State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis.2d 536, 541, 363 N.W.2d 419, 422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11882 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion. See State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis.2d 536, 541, 363 N.W.2d 419, 422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11882 - 2005-03-31