Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
held the other acts evidence was properly admitted to rebut Evans’ claim that the shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106336 - 2014-01-06
held the other acts evidence was properly admitted to rebut Evans’ claim that the shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106336 - 2014-01-06
State v. Guy Douglas
to a secured facility for treatment. Douglas claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31
to a secured facility for treatment. Douglas claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contract Demopoulos claimed they had for melding the parts of two large trucks to make one road- worthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253204 - 2020-02-05
the contract Demopoulos claimed they had for melding the parts of two large trucks to make one road- worthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253204 - 2020-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that it was procedurally barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that it was procedurally barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Avery
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Guy Douglas
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentencing. He claimed that he “was not fully aware of the factual allegations in the complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
to sentencing. He claimed that he “was not fully aware of the factual allegations in the complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for failing to claim trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) raise Fourth and Fourteenth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
for failing to claim trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) raise Fourth and Fourteenth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21