Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 58506 for speedy trial.
County of Pepin v. Robert O.O.
placement order, contending that he was denied his right to a twelve-person jury, and that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13782 - 2005-03-31
placement order, contending that he was denied his right to a twelve-person jury, and that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
. We conclude that the trial court properly denied relief on Keith’s petitions, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12888 - 2017-09-21
. We conclude that the trial court properly denied relief on Keith’s petitions, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12888 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47706 - 2010-03-08
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47706 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
State v. Robert K.
that the State had proven the grounds for termination in connection with each of the children. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7641 - 2017-09-19
that the State had proven the grounds for termination in connection with each of the children. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7641 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rufus P. West
) motion for postconviction relief.[1] The trial court summarily denied West’s claims under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6361 - 2005-03-31
) motion for postconviction relief.[1] The trial court summarily denied West’s claims under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6361 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
DeMarinis Pizza Place, Inc. v. Vincent DeMarinis
, Schudson and Cane, JJ. PER CURIAM. Dominic and Philip De Marinis appeal the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11165 - 2017-09-19
, Schudson and Cane, JJ. PER CURIAM. Dominic and Philip De Marinis appeal the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11165 - 2017-09-19
Lafayette County v. John L.N.
. DYKMAN, P.J.[1] John L.N. appeals from a trial court order committing him to the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12274 - 2005-03-31
. DYKMAN, P.J.[1] John L.N. appeals from a trial court order committing him to the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Peterson
and threatened the trial judge. This conduct prompted the judge to direct a deputy sheriff to arrest Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11888 - 2017-09-21
and threatened the trial judge. This conduct prompted the judge to direct a deputy sheriff to arrest Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11888 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bridget P.
CURLEY, J.[1] Bridget P. appeals the trial court’s orders terminating her parental rights to her four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6963 - 2005-03-31
CURLEY, J.[1] Bridget P. appeals the trial court’s orders terminating her parental rights to her four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6963 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Ozaukee v. Jason T. Winkel
2 and impartial jury. Because Winkel did not raise this issue before the trial court, we deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11948 - 2017-09-21
2 and impartial jury. Because Winkel did not raise this issue before the trial court, we deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11948 - 2017-09-21