Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1441 - 1450 of 69380 for as he.
Search results 1441 - 1450 of 69380 for as he.
State v. Todd N. Triebold
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the prosecutor violated § 971.23(7), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9187 - 2011-05-16
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the prosecutor violated § 971.23(7), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9187 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in possession of a firearm. He also appeals an order denying his motion for resentencing. On appeal, Horne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26
in possession of a firearm. He also appeals an order denying his motion for resentencing. On appeal, Horne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 At the suppression hearing, an officer testified that, on October 25, 2021, he attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
2 At the suppression hearing, an officer testified that, on October 25, 2021, he attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Thomas R. Kelso
-2- He raises a single issue: whether the trial court erred in determining that Kelso had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8685 - 2017-09-19
-2- He raises a single issue: whether the trial court erred in determining that Kelso had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8685 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130454 - 2017-09-21
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130454 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130454 - 2014-11-25
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130454 - 2014-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child who had not attained the age of thirteen. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901098 - 2025-01-14
of a child who had not attained the age of thirteen. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901098 - 2025-01-14
State v. Leroy A. Yench
challenges the trial court’s findings of fact that he was confused as to his obligations under the Implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
challenges the trial court’s findings of fact that he was confused as to his obligations under the Implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leroy A. Yench
that he was confused as to his obligations under the Implied Consent Law and simply mentioned a urine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
that he was confused as to his obligations under the Implied Consent Law and simply mentioned a urine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
State v. Duane A. Earley
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.25(1)(a) (1999-2000).[1] He has also appealed from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3616 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.25(1)(a) (1999-2000).[1] He has also appealed from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3616 - 2005-03-31